|
| |
| |
Pest Management - Frequently Asked Questions
- I am not trained to make pest management recommendations, so how
will I be able develop pest management plans?
-
NRCS’s Pest Management Standard is different from
what is commonly understood as "pest management". The prime function of
the pest management component of a conservation plan is to reduce
the environmental risk of pest management activities. We do not
want to take over the role of professional pest management advisors who
regularly make pest management recommendations, but we do want to work
closely with them to help producers develop resource-friendly pest
management alternatives as part of an overall Resource Management System.
- I’m already a Certified Crop Advisor. Does that mean I’m
automatically an NRCS Pest Management Specialist?
-
No. CCA certification does not automatically
certify you as an NRCS Pest Management Specialist. CCA certification
focuses on pest identification and appropriate pest management techniques.
NRCS Pest Management Specialist certification focuses on environmental
risk evaluation and recommending mitigation to meet NRCS Pest Management
Standard requirements. CCA certification and NRCS Pest Management
Specialist certification require different skill sets that are not
interchangeable, but they do have some overlap.
- What does mitigation have to do with pest management?
-
Mitigation simply means to "make less severe".
Mitigation as it relates to NRCS Pest Management is defined as: "The
process of minimizing the potential for harmful impacts of pest management
activities on soil, water, air, plant, and animal resources through the
application of conservation practices and/or management techniques." When
we "mitigate" hazardous off-site movement of pesticides or sediment, we
are decreasing the potential for those losses to cause damage to at-risk
resources.
- How much mitigation is enough?
-
This is not an easy question to answer. In
applying the NRCS Pest Management Standard, there is no numeric "T" value
to use as a target. Current NRCS Field Office pesticide risk screening
tools are qualitative (e.g., Low, Intermediate, High) rather than
quantitative (e.g., .5 tons/acre). Since pesticide pollution is often
intermittent and at low concentrations, it is difficult to quantify
sufficient mitigation, especially in the short term. We must therefore
rely on the professional judgement of conservation planners to
implementation mitigation techniques that have been shown effective by
research. Finding the right set of management techniques and conservation
practices that do not over or under mitigate will take collaboration with
researchers and practical experience.
Our goal is to reduce potential hazards to the
equivalent of a Low or Very Low WIN-PST rating. Since site conditions
vary widely due to climate, topography, soils, crop management, distance
to sensitive water bodies etc., sets of mitigation techniques that are
applicable to specific areas should be developed at the state or area
level.
- Will every Resource Management System conservation plan require a
pest management component?
-
Yes and no. If pests are not being managed
on land you are planning, then you do not have to apply the Pest
Management Standard. If pests are being managed on the land you are
planning, then the Pest Management Standard applies and you will have to
develop a pest management component for the overall conservation plan.
There are some caveats to that however - in the first several years after
your state implements the Pest Management Standard, it is not expected
that every farm will receive an in depth pest management component. The
Pest Management Standard should fist be applied where there is a high risk
from pest management activities to vulnerable resources. This includes
land in close proximity to at-risk resources and other land that has been
shown to directly impact at-risk resources. In some cases, reporting that
there are no identifiable at-risk resources may satisfy the Pest
Management Standard.
- Does pesticide rate, form and timing have to be documented in the
conservation plan?
-
No. The Pest Management Standard does not require
you to include pesticide rate, form and timing in the plan. Some of that
information may be necessary to do an environmental risk screening, but it
does not have to be carried into the plan. Rate form and timing for
non-chemical pest control measures (such as tillage for weed control) may
have to be documented in other plan components.
- Can NRCS provide Extension pesticide recommendations to producers?
-
Yes. Nothing in NRCS Pest Management Policy
prohibits us from providing Extension pesticide recommendations to
producers. However, it would not be acceptable for NRCS to develop our own
pesticide recommendations based on label information.
- Will I have to be licensed if I give Extension recommendations
and/or pesticide specific environmental risk information to producers?
-
Maybe. Each state has its own criteria for
pesticide licensing so this question cannot be answered on a national
basis. Some states do not require any pesticide licensing. Some states
require licensing for everyone that gives any pesticide-related assistance
to producers, including pesticide specific environmental risk information.
Some states have public licenses for government employees. All state
requirements must be met, so you may be required to be licensed to provide
pest management assistance to producers in the conservation planning
process.
- Do you have to be an NRCS certified Pest Management Specialist to
develop the pest management component of a plan?
-
No. Anyone can develop the pest management
component of a conservation plan. However, only an NRCS certified Pest
Management Specialist can approve the pest management component of the
plan. Experienced planners, including NRCS employees and Third Party
Vendors, should be able to meet NRCS pest management certification
requirements with appropriate training.
- Why should NRCS planners have to approve someone else’s pesticide
recommendations?
-
Approval of the pest management component of a
conservation plan does not include approval of the efficacy and
economics of pesticide recommendations. Approval of the pest management
component only means that planned pest management activities have been
screened for potential environmental risks as required by the Pest
Management Standard contained in the local FOTG, and all identified risks
have been mitigated in the overall conservation plan according to quality
criteria in the local FOTG.
- If unusual circumstances during the growing season call for
pesticide recommendations that are not included in the pest management
component of the conservation plan, should the plan be updated?
-
Maybe. Infrequent use of a pesticide that was not
in the original plan is acceptable. The Pest Management Standard states
that "Environmental risk analysis with approved tools and/or procedures
should be done for probable pest management recommendations by crop
(if applicable) and pest." If a pesticide use was unforeseen, it could not
have been included in the plan. However, if a new pesticide use is
expected to become commonplace (probable), the pest management component
of the conservation plan should be revised to include it and any
appropriate mitigation should be added to the plan. If there is no
reasonable way to determine probable pest management recommendations, then
mitigation should be planned for the highest potential hazard(s) for that
crop.
|
| |
|